ILLUSTRATIVE OUTPUT
A decision brief that shows its working.
This fictional example demonstrates format and methodology. It is not a live tender and must not be used to make a commercial decision.
Illustrative example only. Buyer, dates, value and criteria below are fictional. A real brief always links to the original public notice.
DECISION BRIEF / 0142
Workforce learning delivery programme
87HIGH FIT
Service match29 / 30
Eligibility18 / 20
Geography10 / 10
Contract size9 / 10
Comparable evidence13 / 15
Delivery capacity8 / 10
Deadline runway5 / 5
Why it appears to fit
- The requested delivery model overlaps directly with the profiled workforce-learning service.
- The contract value sits inside the stated £75,000–£250,000 range.
- Two profiled case studies appear comparable in audience, scale and delivery method.
- The region and response runway are inside the declared commercial boundaries.
Verify before “go”
- Information security: the profile does not confirm the specified assurance level.
- Named capacity: verify availability of the proposed lead facilitator.
- Evidence wording: confirm one case study can be disclosed and includes measurable outcomes.
Recommended next step
RECOMMENDATION: INVESTIGATE
Assign a 30-minute owner to verify the three unknowns against the original documents. Proceed to a full bid/no-bid review only if every mandatory requirement is met.
Source discipline
A production brief includes the notice URL, identifier, publication date, deadline and last-checked timestamp. Generated analysis is labelled and never replaces the original notice or procurement documents.